Briefly This Week

Joshua Kagan — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 05:01:09 +0000

Here’s a summary of the stories I’ve been following this week:

Elektra v. Barker and London-Sire v. Doe: Can merely “making available” a file on a P2P network constitute copyright infringement, or does infringement require that a plaintiff prove that the file was actually downloaded by a third party? Maybe not. Coincidentally, I’m currently working on a seminar paper on this very topic.
Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC.: Roommates.com was denied § 230 immunity by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Eric Goldman comments on his blog.
Perfect 10 v. Visa: This is a secondary liability suit in which a copyright owner unsuccessfully sought damages from a group of credit card companies that process transactions for infringers overseas. On appeal, the plaintiff has now been joined with an amicus brief filed by the MPAA, RIAA, and others, as well as another amicus brief filed by the an organization that polices with counterfeit apparel and sneakers. I’ll comment on this sometime soon once I’ve had an opportunity to read the briefs.
A class-action was settled by Apple last week after some consumers complained that the flat panel displays on their Apple notebook computers don’t display as many colors as they should, leading to inferior image quality. This week, an identical suit was filed complaining that Apple’s “iMac” line of all-in-one desktop computers have the same problem. Apple might settle again simply to avoid negative press, but the truth here is that all flat panel displays from all manufacturers have this issue. No flat panel display can mimic every color that the human eye can see, so they all fake it using a technique called dithering.

The Website and Blog of Joshua R. Kagan » class-action

Briefly This Week